Eye-Opening Perspectives for Heroic Hearts

Eye-Opening Perspectives for Heroic Hearts

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Mrs. Alan Greenspan, Andrea Mitchell, Promotes Class Warfare

Suggests Paying for Social Security Cuts With Millionaire Tax
By Winsip Custer CPW News Service
     During her Wednesday, December 7th , 2011 Andrea Mitchell Reports program on MSNBC, the wife of former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan, Andrea Mitchell, asked U.S. Senator from West Virginia, Democrat Joe Manchin and Republican Senator of Illinois, Mark Kirk, why they have challenged President Obama's proposed payroll tax cut.  The cut aimed at reducing contributions to Social Security has infuriated the two Senators, who hide their anger with gracious statesmanship.
     “Social Security is NOT charity,” said Kirk.  “People have paid into the program.  It is a retirement security program paid for by contributions of workers.”
     Andrea Mitchell asked “What if another way was found to pay for the cut like a millionaires' tax?”
     Kirk asserted that the cut would cost Social Security $250 billion versus its current $10 billion in the red.  Noting the nation’s $15 trillion deficit, “Social Security is relatively healthy in comparison,” asserts Dr. Walencus Z. Spiffelbeck of the Citizens for Sane Leadership who found Mrs. Greenspan's question highly objectionable and a short term subterfuge leading to the eventual repeal of Social Security once it is viewed as welfare.  


      “Mrs. Greenspan’s question was aimed at infuriating rich people and promoting class warfare.  Why should people who have paid into a national system all their lives suddenly ask that the same idiots who ran up the deficit through Mr. Hank Paulson’s bail out  pay for something they abhor so they can turn around in a year or so and point a finger at the middle class and poor and call them beggars?  Are Mrs. Greenspan and the President nuts?"
     “Our group rejects payroll tax cuts in favor of mandatory penalties for business fraud to be paid directly into the coffers of the Social Security System to offset the current or future deficit.   If you think of corporations as teams playing in a national league, like the NFL or AFL or NBA, these teams don’t let their players bet against their own teams, or to deal drugs to the spectators or peddle steroids to kids at the local playground.  They get penalized if they do...which is what should have happened with companies like Enron, Worldcom, HealthSouth, ColumbiaHCA, United Health Group, Arthur Anderson, Country Wide, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sacks and others like those who sold sub prime mortgages like punk junkies in South Chicago then used that as excuse to take our sovereign money.....ours not theirs.....to bail them out of a problem of their own making.  Joe Schmo was not sophisticated enough to have created the problem by wanting a house with a bigger bedroom.  That fiasco was Wall Street and Madison Ave rigged, pure and simple and then they bailed themselves out of their own septic tank using sovereign money.   Your money.  My money.   And if the NFL paid their penalties into a fund for the older players whose knees and hips have deteriorated like Dick Butkus’ and other I can think of... well you get my point.   If  we have a 15-20% corruption rate among corporations... which is probably even higher... and use that to leverage their assets into the coffers of social security,  then all’s well that ends well,” said Spiffelbeck.  
     Spifflebeck suggests that the same principle could be used by Penn State to divert money from its scandalous football program into its primary mission of education.  “I am hopeful that under this new approach it is proven that even the Federal Reserve is a criminal enterprise and that it be penalized so that its assets be diverted into the Social Security program,” said Spiffelbeck.  "Let the millionaires tax themselves through penalties when they stray off course, but don't blame the American worker by making them into welfare recipients.  Citizens for Sane Leadership also promote bans against moving production facilities offshore to Communist and tyrannical regions while returning goods made there to the U.S. by companies like Walmart.  Mr. Walton who founded the company and drove around that old truck as a symbol of his simplicity?  His father's job during the Great Depression was to evict American farmers from their homes at a time when they were most vulnerable.  That old truck was a reminded of Farmer Green Jeans who's now on foot.  So Walton's  cheap foreign goods made by the equivalent of slave labor is an example of the American free market system at it's best? I don't think so.  Put tariffs on goods made in communist and tyrannical countries like China and use that to replenish Social Security since that policy raped Social Security in the first place by taking our jobs," said Spiffelbeck.  "And give free U.S. citizenship and clandestine escape from their captors to any foreign citizens of tyrannical regions who will provide the proof we need of their crap and corruption so that we can go after their assets in a new international court aimed at promoting worldwide peace and stability.  Is Obama some kind of  an idiot for proposing this step back to the jungle?" asked Spiffelbeck.

No comments:

Post a Comment